Crickets, cool summer nights, peaches and plums, no bombs, at least not here, it could go on like this forever. But in places not so far away from here women are being flogged for godknowswhat transgression by mullahs or other self-righteous men who see women as little more than breeding machines or, god forbid, mysterious and slightly scary objects of lust.
Wazhma Frogh who is a social activist studying in the UK wrote about this. I started the day reading her article (Internalizing Impunity in Afghanistan/Daily Times, Pakistan, May 23). It left me feeling angry and impotent. She writes about the impunity with which bullies, armed and dangerous, are left to call the shots in many places in this country. Here, with the crickets and peaches, I live in an entirely different world.
There are other, smaller, acts that reek of greed, attempts at self enrichment, unless they are to keep a family alive – how would you know? It reminds me of the moral development questions that we asked to children in (then) war-torn Lebanon. We wanted to test the hypothesis that children who grow up in an environment where the gun and money determine what is lawful and what is not would be amoral or at least behind in their moral development.
We asked them, what if you stole medicine for someone who could not pay and would otherwise die. Would that be OK? These were Kohlberg’s questions, later unmasked by Carol Gilligan as biased – they stem from a time when we thought male development was the norm, which makes women by definition abnormal. I think many men here still believe that.
It is performance evaluation time at MSH. The process, so logical and coherent in the US looks very different here. It is probably as countercultural as a process can get: confronting people directly, black on white, whether they performing well or not. As long as the forms record good or very good performance the process works fine and is motivating and encouraging.
But when someone is not doing what they should be doing it becomes more complicated quickly. In this society where indirect communication is the norm, this is too painfully straightforward – recht voor zijn raap – we call that in Holland, poorly translated as ‘straight for the head.’ Sometimes we confuse transparent with direct. Processes imported from one culture in another have all the basic assumptions about what are appropriate and inappropriate interactions between people attached to them, and then become inseparable.
I try my best to model commitment to the performance review process. I do believe in it as a tool to help people grow and develop. But the deadlines for handing in the signed forms require compliance – I figured I can comply if I do a quick and dirty approach so that the files are complete on time and I am seen as a good manager. Commitment makes for very long work days – compliance is much easier.
Amidst the anger, frustration, impotence and approaching deadlines some very good news is on the horizon: we have another two women shortlisted for positions in our project. Things are looking good.
Recent Comments